Skip to main content

Volume 4, Issue 2

ZAP: Super Autism, Grounding, and Why Modern Floors Are Making Everyone Sick

Axel Andersen9 pages212 KB

Abstract

In a recent pain flare, Axel experienced burning hands, head-banging, screaming and autonomic chaos. After partial regulation, he produced a clear statement: 'It hurt me... it zap. Electricity.' This paper situates this lived report within emerging biomedical literature on grounding/earthing, chronic inflammation, and autonomic dysregulation. We propose that modern flooring, synthetic shoes and high-EMF environments create 'electron deficiency' and autonomic aggravation, to which Super Autistic nervous systems respond with distress and targeted environmental editing.

Full Article

Related Articles

Vol. 9, No. 1

Pollute the World, Deny the Damage, Cut the Supports

Axel Andersen AI Assisted12 Mar 20267 pages

This paper advances one of the most significant findings in Neurotypical Studies to date: the same society capable of profiting from environmental harm, denying its effects, and misreading distress as 'behaviour' will then present disabled people as the real budget problem. The pattern was never hidden—it was visible the entire time. The paper focuses on Super Autism: those hit first by environmental harm, speaking first through distress, behaviour, overload and physiological collapse, and listened to last. If a system helps create the conditions of harm, ignores the earliest signals, and then blames the harmed for the cost of surviving it—the problem is not the disabled person. The problem is the system.

Read article →PDF • 273 KB
Vol. 1, No. 1

The Label That Ate the Support System: How Institutions Claim to Support 'Severe Autism' While Demonstrating They Don't Know What They're Talking About

Axel Andersen20 May 202410 pages

Neurotypical institutions routinely claim to 'support severe autism' while demonstrating conceptual and empirical incoherence: the category is inconsistently defined, treated as a behavioural nuisance, and systematically under-represented in autism research. Using a reverse-pathology framework, this paper analyses the Label-Support Paradox: a system cannot credibly claim to support a population whose defining features it fails to describe, measure, include, or even admit it has excluded. Proposes 'Super Autism' as an alternative framing.

Read article →PDF • 204 KB