Volume 1, Issue 1

Autism Was Never Added to Barbie. You Just Finally Noticed.

Axel Andersen5 May 20253 pages424 KB

Barbie autism identity representation satire

Abstract

Following Mattel's announcement of an 'Autistic Barbie' (complete with officially sanctioned traits and accessories), this paper argues a far more confronting position: Barbie and Ken have always been autistic. Not biologically, not diagnostically—but relationally. Autism, we propose, has never been inherent to the doll. It emerges through who is playing, how, and whose inner world is allowed to animate plastic.

Full Article

3 pages

A satirical-serious conceptual analysis of normality, administrative convenience, and the authoritarian urge. This article examines how disability rights are systematically deprioritised in moments of democratic stress, functioning as a canary in the coalmine for broader erosions of rights and protections.

The Stillness Industrial Complex: Why Neurotypicals Don't Stim (In Public), and Why They Police Ours

An investigation into the perplexing absence of visible stimming among neurotypicals and the parallel enthusiasm for suppressing other people's stimming. Findings suggest neurotypicals do stim, but in camouflage (leg bouncing under tables, cuticle excavation, marathon 'coffee walks'). Visible, joyful stimming is reclassified as 'disruptive' because it fails the national test of Professional Statuesque—the belief that stillness equals competence and vibration equals mutiny.

Schrödinger's Normal: A Quantum Analysis of Neurotypical Expectations

'Normal' is a neurotypical ideal that collapses under observation, much like a quantum particle—or a government budget forecast. This study explores the paradox autistic people face when evaluated by neurotypical standards: the requirement to be simultaneously normal enough to be unproblematic and disabled enough to justify support. We term this phenomenon Schrödinger's Normal.

Vol. 8, No. 2

Learning Under Fluorescent Warfare: Neurotypical Attachment to Non-Conducive Educational Environments

Axel Andersen25 Feb 20252 pages

Despite overwhelming evidence that sensory-hostile environments impair learning, neurotypical administrators remain steadfast in their belief that fluorescent light enhances concentration and that 'quiet corners' can be drawn with masking tape. Children with heightened perception—commonly mislabeled as 'disruptive'—display physiological escape responses ('bolting') when placed in rooms acoustically engineered for despair. Case studies confirm that consequences can be fatal. Still, the prevailing intervention remains compliance training, not environmental reform.

Read article →PDF • 103 KB

Vol. 520

The Administrative Danger Response: A Systems-Level Model

Axel Andersen1 Nov 20246 pages

A satirical but clinically observable model describing how Australian systems: (1) deny complexity, (2) demand simplistic fixes, (3) moralise biology as laziness, (4) blame disabled people for macroeconomic events, and (5) generate revenue streams from the resulting distress. Findings suggest ADR is self-sustaining and resistant to evidence, particularly when the evidence contains 'trigger words' such as metabolism, inflammation, disability, environment, or accountability.

Read article →PDF • 136 KB

Vol. 3, No. 2

If Enjoyment Invalidates Therapeutic Benefit, Then Playgrounds Must Be Banned

Axel Andersen15 Mar 20255 pages

The NDIA recently argued that a therapy's effectiveness is negated if a child 'enjoys it,' leading to rejection of art therapy, music therapy, and registered nursing supports. This study investigates the broader implications of applying this logic to the general population. Findings indicate that, if implemented consistently, NDIA logic would require removal of playgrounds, elimination of recess, banning of birthday parties, and cancellation of joy in general. The study concludes that the NDIA may be suffering from Therapeutic Fun Aversion Syndrome (TFAS).

Read article →PDF • 116 KB

Vol. 1, No. 1

Behaviour: A Field Guide to Diagnostic Overshadowing

Axel Andersen15 Aug 20245 pages

This review argues that 'behaviour' is frequently deployed not as description but as an interpretive technology that produces diagnostic overshadowing: the conversion of pain, sensory distress, trauma responses, medical needs, and environmental mismatch into 'noncompliance' or 'behaviour of concern.' Drawing on Hacking's account of classification and Rosenhan's demonstration of institutional interpretive capture, this paper proposes that 'behaviour' functions as an administrative slot that can override alternative explanations and restrict access to support.

Read article →PDF • 112 KB